This new report really complicates what we are going through right now because it basically concluded that the damage caused by the jabs (as reported in VAERS) is consistently variable based on which lot number was received and that there are "safer" lots which went to only 12 states and "dangerous" lots which went to between 13 and 50 states!
Spoiler alert: the states were not disclosed but I have personally sent a message asking for this information. It's not clear why they didn't disclose that information.
So just the other day TheExpose.uk dropped a report which analyzed VAERS data of both the Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 lots for adverse events, hospitalizations and deaths and they founds some very interesting but rather disturbing information.
In case you are new to this VAERS is the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System which is the only reporting system active in the US for public data on adverse events that is specific to vaccine injury. It's run by the CDC and the FDA.
This new report seems like a clever analysis because they used data from Influenza vaccines as a control group to establish a baseline of how many adverse events that could be expected per lot number as well as the spread of adverse events across many different lots numbers. This analysis included the average number of hospitalizations and deaths per lot as well as the minimums and maximums in these categories per lot number.
It's not 100% clear how many vials are in each lot because these pharma companies are clearly disclosing the least amount of information they can get away with at this point and they are clearly taking advantage of the liability shield that was established last year (by Trump?) when this whole fiasco started. However, it is estimated that each lot has approximately 1000 vials and that this equates to 6000 doses.
So when we see that for the Influenza shots data shows:
The VAERS database showed a total of 1,608 adverse event reports against the flu vaccines alongside 15 deaths and 73 hospitalisations. The total count of lot numbers returned was 494.
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/CL6NVTZ5Q3Yv/And again this is 494 lots so this isn't just a tiny sample of five or ten lots.
With that baseline it's quite disturbing to me that this is what we are seeing for Pfizer in this analysis:
The VAERS database showed a total of 171,463 adverse event reports against the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine alongside 2,828 deaths and 14,262 hospitalisations. The total count of lot numbers returned was 4,522.
This data alone shows that there have been 106 times as many adverse reactions, 189 times as many deaths, and 195 times as many hospitalisations due to the Pfizer Covid-19 jab than there have been due to all other influenza vaccines combined.
In this case the data is pulled from nearly ten times as many lots as the control, but again this is analyzing the reports PER LOT number so this is very significant!
This is even more disturbing data:
The highest number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against a single lot number of the influenza vaccine was 26. Which makes it all the more shocking to discover that the highest number of adverse event reports made to VAERS against a single lot number of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine up to October 15th 2021 was 3,563, and this isn’t an anomaly.
Moderna isn't any better either. The data on Moderna show that the highest number of adverse events reported from a single lot was 4967. This number is huge considering we are assuming a lot size of approximately 6000 doses!
Digging in deeper we see the spread of adverse events in the Moderna lots was also wide:
The data reveals that 2,908 lots (64%) had just a single adverse event report made against them, whilst 2 specific lots had over 3000 adverse event reports made against them.
Shockingly we can also see from the data that 30 lots of Pfizer vaccine had between 1,000 and 1,499 adverse event reports per lot, another 20 lots had between 1,500 and 1,999 adverse event reports per lot, and another 23 lots had between 2,000 and 2,499 adverse event reports per lot.
The big question we need to be asking is why hasn't the CDC or FDA discovered this data in their own data banks? Especially in light that they are now giving authorization to Pfizer for 5-11 year olds when these children have literally zero risk of death from the condition known as Covid-19.
Moving on with this report it actually got worse...
When analyzing the data for Pfizer lots it shows that 96% of the lots analyzed had zero deaths reported and that only 4% of the lots have had 2828 deaths reported!
Five lot numbers were associated with 61-80 deaths each, a further 5 lot numbers were associated with 81-100 deaths each, and just 2 separate lot numbers were associated with over 100 deaths each.
So why are these specific lots associated with so many deaths and the others are not?
Well before we get to that let's look at Moderna for corroboration of the above.
Again with Moderna 95% of all the lots analyzed had zero deaths reported and 5% had 2603 deaths reported!
Thirteen lot numbers were associated with 41-60 deaths each, 2 lot numbers were associated with 61-80 deaths each and 1 lot number was associated with 81-100 deaths.
Of course the next question was where were the lots distributed to. I would have suspected that it would be simpler to distribute an entire lot (or multiple lots) to each state meaning each lot number would only exist in one state. This way if a recall was needed for a specific lot it would all be consolidated in a single state. However, this is not how these lots were distributed for whatever reason.
In fact one lot in California was reported in the news as being recalled in Orange County California and this was lot number 041L20A from Moderna but this lot was allegedly still distributed in other areas of the country!
That specific lot was identified as the 2nd most damaging lot number from Moderna in terms of the number of adverse events overall. Death numbers were analyzed separately.
...identified the actual lot numbers of Moderna vaccine that have caused the most harm in the USA. The most harmful of which is lot number ‘039K20A’; causing over 4,000 adverse event reports.
This next part is a real doozy!
4,289 different lots of Pfizer vaccine were distributed to 12 states or less across the USA, recording 9,141 adverse event reports against them alongside 99 deaths and 657 hospitalisations. This equates to an average of 2 adverse event reports per lot and 0 deaths and hospitalisations.
However, a further 130 different lots of Pfizer vaccine were distributed to between 13-50 states across the USA, recording 166,170 adverse event reports, 2,799 deaths, and 14,155 hospitalisations. This equates to an average of 1,278 adverse event reports per lot number, alongside 22 deaths and 109 hospitalisations.
This data therefore shows that each lot from the 130 different lot numbers of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine distributed to more than 13 states, harmed on average 639 times more people, hospitalised on average 109 times more people, and killed on average 22 times more people.
There is a lot of speculation going on that "testing" is rampant in this extensive human trial that is ongoing with the human public and that specific lots may represent different formulas that are being "tested" for efficacy. My question is efficacy of what? Of how efficient they are at putting people in the hospital?
In the comments of this report (see link below) someone made this comment:
"Think4yrself" Reply to Ian Parker
I believe you may be correct. Get the book “Vaccine A”. A physician tells of his horrific experience when our U.S. military required the participation of military personnel in a disastrous experiment by vaccine developers at Dover Airforce base. Differing amounts of adjuvant were intentionally administered by batch lot but officials denied the adjuvant altogether initially. The book is available on Audible as well as book form through amazon.
I haven't read that book but it's now on my booklist for this winter...
As you can see this research identifies a lot of issues of consistency with these so called vaccines that are actually intended to be genetic code injections yet these pharma companies are hiding behind a liability shield and the notion of "proprietary" technology in order to avoid questions about such data exemplified above.
Are these inconsistencies due to gross negligence in quality control at the production facilities such as mold contamination? Is this a systemic issue which relates to ongoing "research" on the human population and if so who is in charge of such godlike research?
Here's a video interview about this analysis:
As usual you can see the videos directly and subscribe here:
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/CL6NVTZ5Q3Yv/
Thank you for reading and spreading the truth. Please share this post far and wide to get this out and stop censorship and share your thoughts in the comments below.
Source:
Photo By Viewminder
